Owner
Post by Franko10 ™ on Mar 25, 2005 8:51:51 GMT -5
jay_adobe for March 24/05 (FWIW)
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 09:57 AM EST
Msg. 864656 of 866333
Jump to msg. #
My only post for today. Revocation for one year absolutely locks the shorts in place with no where to go. The dividends we all received are part of the short problem. CIM will IPO within that year. Restrictions for your divi shares will be lifted within that year (and then you would have been able to trade NSS divi shares). UC and IBM are telling everyone that we cannot be revoked if this NSS problem is to go away. Watch for a settlement to occur that will eliminate the NSS problem. PR was a way for UC and IBM to offer face-saving for SEC. SEC cannot be found publicly liable here. IT's too big. We will take the fall, but we will be richly rewarded. Can't say more. Must go.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=864656
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:48 PM EST
Msg. 865400 of 866333
Jump to msg. #
After all the NSS are legitimized, which appears to be happening at an accelerated pace, the next logical step is settlement, in which all our divi shares (which are shorted too) will go away, leaving us with our CMKX shares. Logically, the following step would be to tender us to take the company private, thus allowing subjugation by the SEC, but only after we all are richly rewarded. I do not like to think that we would allow the SEC to subjugate us, but for the obvious face-saving which is necessary to keep the SEC's appearance clean, I believe we will have to undergo it. If revoked, we will have already transferred assets to another company to open on another board through some type of transaction, probably similar to a roll-up IPO or a reverse merger. IBM's signature is all over this latest PR, and I firmly have faith in what is transpiring with the company. I think a settlement is on the way very soon. I think the administrative hearing will be void of our presence. I think it all will be completed before then. Recommend reading PHXGOLD's post earlier today for an insight where IBM is taking us. IMO. This was a good PR. You just have to look for the nuggets.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865400
***THE PHXGOLD POST noted above follows***
otcsmart
Diamondologist
member is offline
For a Top Penny Research site, Click on my Homepage!
Posts: 469
Re: jay_adobe for March 24/05 (FWIW)
« Reply #1 on: Today at 10:03pm »<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here you go!
By: phxgold
24 Mar 2005, 11:40 AM EST
Msg. 181862 of 182421
Jump to msg. #
Good morning! this is an interresting turn of events!
make your self fully reporting again to allow the sec to make you a non reporting pink? sounds crazy except it forces the sec to address securities issues in a public forum. oh btw a non reporting company can become reporting thru a backdoor registration by merging w/ a blank check company. all they need is an 8k and current financials. oh almost forgot this is the stocklein law groups fortay.
oh yeah anthony demint creaqted 15 blank check companies this year. for those who dont know anthony demint is maheu's business partner and theyre representation is the stocklein law group.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=181862
From: cmkxdiamond.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1111726550&start=0
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:51 PM EST
Msg. 865408 of 866335
Jump to msg. #
As brokerage houses continue to clean up their own mess, they will only allow you to close your position. This is happening now.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865408
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:59 PM EST
Msg. 865424 of 866335
(This msg. is a reply to 865407 by great_giant_head.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr Great Giant, you pose some very valid, well-thought out questions which the company desparately wishes to provide information about. I think the company's hands have been tied somewhat by the SEC, as more material information which is released would also tip the hand to those that have been naked shorting us for so long. As stated in the PR this morning, the company may not be allowed to put out all the information that they would like to put out in filings. I think we are part of a very huge deal, and have worked very closely with the SEC and other regulatory bodies to get to where we are today. I think we don't have much longer to wait. The dam is about to burst. Hold tight. Prepare for wealth. I think we will get answers to your questions very soon. Remember, our timeline is not the company's timeline, but the company's timeline is our timeline. We just don't know the company's timeline yet. IMO.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865424
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:01 PM EST
Msg. 865431 of 866336
(This msg. is a reply to 865420 by lizzie_007.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr Lizzie, if the commission suspends our registration, could we not on the very next day get tendered to go private, similar to what deBeers did?
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865431
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:28 PM EST
Msg. 865551 of 866337
Jump to msg. #
Does anyone NOT believe that UC knew he was being naked shorted back in July 2003? Of course he knew, thus the termination of registration requirements commenced. Note specifically what Section 12g-4 states: Registration of any class of security pursuant to this subsection shall be terminated ninety days, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine, after the issuer files a certification with the Commission that the number of holders of record of such class of security is reduced to less than three hundred persons. """The Commission shall after notice and opportunity for hearing deny termination of registration if it finds that the certification is untrue.""" Termination of registration shall be deferred pending final determination on the question of denial.
Since the commission validated the termination, was UC at fault here for the error, or was it part of the plan? Is the SEC at fault, or is all fault being placed on UC? Who should be monitoring these transactions, the SEC maybe??
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865551
By: livingstonecatabbi
24 Mar 2005, 03:38 PM EST
Msg. 865597 of 866337
Jump to msg. #
Does anyone have VWAP Level III trades? Rumor is Equity Settlement is requiring the DTC and the SEC to borrow from the IMF to settle naked short cases or the FBI and the CIA as well as the CDC is going to go after Donaldson house and other personal assets. Jay, can you corroborate this rumor?
Last trade was executed @ 179.50 for orders of 1000 shares.
TIA
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865597
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:42 PM EST
Msg. 865606 of 866337
(This msg. is a reply to 865597 by livingstonecatabbi.)
Jump to msg. #
livings, you are not a believer in this company are you? Have the faith.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865606
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 04:21 PM EST
Msg. 865699 of 866339
(This msg. is a reply to 865676 by jfarn.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr. jfarn, I am simply hearing that Good Friday is just that. I believe my source. I have the utmost faith in the company. And even when times appear on the surface to be somewhat slightly bleak (but calm), the undercurrent is churning away and preparing to unleash a force to be reckoned with that the financial markets have not yet seen. But the churning is occurring at a feverish pace unseen to us, while we are left to read and reread the PR released today. A diversion? Maybe. A warning? Absolutely. A promise to deliver? Undoubtedly. IBM and UC at work? That question is left to whatever you personally believe within the framework of your motives for continuing to own this stock. If your in, you win; if you doubt, get out. Pretty simple, I think. I'm in until it's over. Good evening to all.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865699
carquest writes: "Listen to Jay Adobe"
By: carquest44
24 Mar 2005, 12:28 PM EST
Msg. 865141 of 866342
(This msg. is a reply to 865102 by MichaelWC.)
Jump to msg. #
MichaelWC,
The deal is near, so near you can reach out and touch it. However, with the massive forces against us it is in CMKX's best interest to not reveal their hand at this time. The SEC is in a world of hurt right now and they know it, and need all stall tactics available to figure out what is the most gracious way to save face. There is no doubt in my mind that David will slay Goliath again. Listen to Jay A, he is a good poster with integrity. I am confident we will win. Have a good day all.
tinyurl.com/4bdbx
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 09:57 AM EST
Msg. 864656 of 866333
Jump to msg. #
My only post for today. Revocation for one year absolutely locks the shorts in place with no where to go. The dividends we all received are part of the short problem. CIM will IPO within that year. Restrictions for your divi shares will be lifted within that year (and then you would have been able to trade NSS divi shares). UC and IBM are telling everyone that we cannot be revoked if this NSS problem is to go away. Watch for a settlement to occur that will eliminate the NSS problem. PR was a way for UC and IBM to offer face-saving for SEC. SEC cannot be found publicly liable here. IT's too big. We will take the fall, but we will be richly rewarded. Can't say more. Must go.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=864656
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:48 PM EST
Msg. 865400 of 866333
Jump to msg. #
After all the NSS are legitimized, which appears to be happening at an accelerated pace, the next logical step is settlement, in which all our divi shares (which are shorted too) will go away, leaving us with our CMKX shares. Logically, the following step would be to tender us to take the company private, thus allowing subjugation by the SEC, but only after we all are richly rewarded. I do not like to think that we would allow the SEC to subjugate us, but for the obvious face-saving which is necessary to keep the SEC's appearance clean, I believe we will have to undergo it. If revoked, we will have already transferred assets to another company to open on another board through some type of transaction, probably similar to a roll-up IPO or a reverse merger. IBM's signature is all over this latest PR, and I firmly have faith in what is transpiring with the company. I think a settlement is on the way very soon. I think the administrative hearing will be void of our presence. I think it all will be completed before then. Recommend reading PHXGOLD's post earlier today for an insight where IBM is taking us. IMO. This was a good PR. You just have to look for the nuggets.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865400
***THE PHXGOLD POST noted above follows***
otcsmart
Diamondologist
member is offline
For a Top Penny Research site, Click on my Homepage!
Posts: 469
Re: jay_adobe for March 24/05 (FWIW)
« Reply #1 on: Today at 10:03pm »<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here you go!
By: phxgold
24 Mar 2005, 11:40 AM EST
Msg. 181862 of 182421
Jump to msg. #
Good morning! this is an interresting turn of events!
make your self fully reporting again to allow the sec to make you a non reporting pink? sounds crazy except it forces the sec to address securities issues in a public forum. oh btw a non reporting company can become reporting thru a backdoor registration by merging w/ a blank check company. all they need is an 8k and current financials. oh almost forgot this is the stocklein law groups fortay.
oh yeah anthony demint creaqted 15 blank check companies this year. for those who dont know anthony demint is maheu's business partner and theyre representation is the stocklein law group.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=181862
From: cmkxdiamond.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1111726550&start=0
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:51 PM EST
Msg. 865408 of 866335
Jump to msg. #
As brokerage houses continue to clean up their own mess, they will only allow you to close your position. This is happening now.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865408
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 02:59 PM EST
Msg. 865424 of 866335
(This msg. is a reply to 865407 by great_giant_head.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr Great Giant, you pose some very valid, well-thought out questions which the company desparately wishes to provide information about. I think the company's hands have been tied somewhat by the SEC, as more material information which is released would also tip the hand to those that have been naked shorting us for so long. As stated in the PR this morning, the company may not be allowed to put out all the information that they would like to put out in filings. I think we are part of a very huge deal, and have worked very closely with the SEC and other regulatory bodies to get to where we are today. I think we don't have much longer to wait. The dam is about to burst. Hold tight. Prepare for wealth. I think we will get answers to your questions very soon. Remember, our timeline is not the company's timeline, but the company's timeline is our timeline. We just don't know the company's timeline yet. IMO.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865424
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:01 PM EST
Msg. 865431 of 866336
(This msg. is a reply to 865420 by lizzie_007.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr Lizzie, if the commission suspends our registration, could we not on the very next day get tendered to go private, similar to what deBeers did?
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865431
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:28 PM EST
Msg. 865551 of 866337
Jump to msg. #
Does anyone NOT believe that UC knew he was being naked shorted back in July 2003? Of course he knew, thus the termination of registration requirements commenced. Note specifically what Section 12g-4 states: Registration of any class of security pursuant to this subsection shall be terminated ninety days, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine, after the issuer files a certification with the Commission that the number of holders of record of such class of security is reduced to less than three hundred persons. """The Commission shall after notice and opportunity for hearing deny termination of registration if it finds that the certification is untrue.""" Termination of registration shall be deferred pending final determination on the question of denial.
Since the commission validated the termination, was UC at fault here for the error, or was it part of the plan? Is the SEC at fault, or is all fault being placed on UC? Who should be monitoring these transactions, the SEC maybe??
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865551
By: livingstonecatabbi
24 Mar 2005, 03:38 PM EST
Msg. 865597 of 866337
Jump to msg. #
Does anyone have VWAP Level III trades? Rumor is Equity Settlement is requiring the DTC and the SEC to borrow from the IMF to settle naked short cases or the FBI and the CIA as well as the CDC is going to go after Donaldson house and other personal assets. Jay, can you corroborate this rumor?
Last trade was executed @ 179.50 for orders of 1000 shares.
TIA
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865597
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 03:42 PM EST
Msg. 865606 of 866337
(This msg. is a reply to 865597 by livingstonecatabbi.)
Jump to msg. #
livings, you are not a believer in this company are you? Have the faith.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865606
By: jay_adobe
24 Mar 2005, 04:21 PM EST
Msg. 865699 of 866339
(This msg. is a reply to 865676 by jfarn.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr. jfarn, I am simply hearing that Good Friday is just that. I believe my source. I have the utmost faith in the company. And even when times appear on the surface to be somewhat slightly bleak (but calm), the undercurrent is churning away and preparing to unleash a force to be reckoned with that the financial markets have not yet seen. But the churning is occurring at a feverish pace unseen to us, while we are left to read and reread the PR released today. A diversion? Maybe. A warning? Absolutely. A promise to deliver? Undoubtedly. IBM and UC at work? That question is left to whatever you personally believe within the framework of your motives for continuing to own this stock. If your in, you win; if you doubt, get out. Pretty simple, I think. I'm in until it's over. Good evening to all.
ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=865699
carquest writes: "Listen to Jay Adobe"
By: carquest44
24 Mar 2005, 12:28 PM EST
Msg. 865141 of 866342
(This msg. is a reply to 865102 by MichaelWC.)
Jump to msg. #
MichaelWC,
The deal is near, so near you can reach out and touch it. However, with the massive forces against us it is in CMKX's best interest to not reveal their hand at this time. The SEC is in a world of hurt right now and they know it, and need all stall tactics available to figure out what is the most gracious way to save face. There is no doubt in my mind that David will slay Goliath again. Listen to Jay A, he is a good poster with integrity. I am confident we will win. Have a good day all.
tinyurl.com/4bdbx
